01 / The gap
Security decisions need evidence
SAST tools are good at finding patterns that might be risky. They are less good at explaining whether a finding matters in the context of your code.
That leaves security teams with a familiar problem: scanners flag a lot, much of it is noise or under-explained, and every finding still needs someone to trace the relevant code before the team can act with confidence.
ICTX exists to close that gap.
02 / Our mission
Help teams trust what their SAST tools report by turning scanner findings into explainable security decisions.
That does not mean asking teams to trust another score or opaque verdict. It means giving them the evidence to inspect the decision for themselves.
03 / How ICTX works
ICTX starts with findings from the scanners you already use. For each finding, it gathers structured, method-level evidence from your actual codebase and configuration.
Deterministic rules apply that evidence to:
- close obvious noise;
- promote findings that deserve review; and
- state clearly what proof is still missing when the available evidence is not enough.
The result is more than a label. It is a decision with a reason: what the code shows, how that evidence affected the outcome, and what a human still needs to verify.
04 / Deterministic by default
Most findings do not need an AI agent to roam across an entire repository and form an opinion. They need the right evidence, evaluated by clear rules.
That is why deterministic analysis is the main engine in ICTX. An AI agent is used only when the evidence is genuinely ambiguous. It is a tiebreaker, not the foundation of the decision.
This makes decisions easier to explain, challenge, and repeat.
05 / What ICTX is—and is not
ICTX is not another scanner. It does not replace the tools that surface potential problems.
It is not an agent guessing over your whole repository. It does not hide uncertainty behind a confident answer.
ICTX is the evidence and decision layer between a scanner finding and the action your team takes next.
06 / What trust looks like
Trust does not come from accepting every automated verdict. It comes from being able to inspect why a decision was made.
For every finding, a useful security decision should make three things clear:
- 1.What evidence did we find?
- 2.What does that evidence support?
- 3.What, if anything, remains unproven?
That is the standard we are building ICTX around: fewer unexplained findings, fewer guesses, and security decisions grounded in the code itself.