Our mission
Keep security in the loop.
We believe AI will produce most software. People will still decide what gets built, set the constraints, guide the systems, and own the consequences.
But we will not review the resulting volume of code by reading every line. The review loop has to get shorter.
The problem
Scanners already produce findings faster than security teams can investigate them. Each finding sends someone back into the code to rebuild the context and decide whether it matters. Much of that work is repetitive.
AI will increase the amount of code and the speed at which it changes. Adding more alerts will not solve the problem.
What we are building
A shorter path from finding to evidence to decision.
ictx attaches structured evidence from the code itself, applies deterministic rules where the evidence is clear, and sends the cases that need judgment to a person. When proof is missing, ictx says what is missing.
This is also why AI is not the main decision engine in ictx. If one model writes the code and another returns an unexplained verdict, the human is left with two conclusions and no solid basis for either one.
Evidence comes first. Deterministic rules handle what can be decided clearly. An AI agent helps only when the evidence is genuinely ambiguous.
The point is not to remove people from security decisions. It is to remove the repetitive work around those decisions so human judgment can be used where it matters.